GMOs: Science Corrupted By Greed
Genetically modified organisms or GMOs are becoming more and
more prevalent in the ever-forward society. Almost all corn, beans, tomatoes, and
other vegetables bought in stores are genetically modified in some ways. Why is
it so prevalent? Fresh produce is called “fresh” for a reason- the shelf life
is limited and goes bad relatively quickly. Genetic Engineering replaces these “weak”
genes with more advantageous genes of other species; for example, many tomatoes
are now engineered with certain fish genes that are more resilient to freezing.
By eliminating the natural weaknesses of vegetables, not only do they last
longer on shelves but increase output due to their resilience to natural threats
(diseases, pests, insecticides, pesticides, etc).
These applications of science seem like solutions to many of
the problems in the world like world hunger and poverty. In addition, the
consumption of GMOs has not been linked to any causes of fatalities, illness,
or disability. If this is the case, why do so many despise it and call it “a freak
of nature?” Part of it is the skepticism in a field of study that involves
changing the natural ways of the world, but this notion will change with time. We
were skeptical of surgeries and vaccines once upon a time- I’m certain that
people will be more comfortable with GMOs in the near future.
However, the biggest criticism comes with the profitability
and business that comes with GMOs. Like how Marie Curie turned blind-eyed at
the profitability of Radium, the profitability of GMOs is blinding the ethics
of corporations and scientists. This is why it is so profitable- GMOs can be
patented just like an invention. Since the genetic code of the modified version
of an organism differs from the traditional version, it is technically a new
specie, or organism. Companies or scientists who engineered this organism then
can claim ownership of the specific breed of the GMO. For instance, the biggest
modified corn producer, Monsanto, sells the seeds of the stronger variety of
corn for a ridiculously high price- obviously turned blind for the money in the
science. So instead of these technologies being used to solve world hunger, it
has become a Louis Vuitton handbag that is sold to the highest bidder.
All in all, I side with Raymo on his perspective of GMOs- the
profitability turns people blind-eyed. Raymo’s imaginations of a Frankenstein’s
monster organism is far-fetched, but he does have a point. Just how far will people
go for fame and money? My stance would be different if GMOs were used to
develop better food production methods in areas faced with starvation. However,
in observing the turn in the greed of the genetic engineering world, I stand against.
Reference: "A Measure of Restraint" by Chet Raymo

Comments
Post a Comment